Wednesday, November 26, 2008

The cost of filling up at the pump appears to be declining. In the past year the peak price of a gallon of gasoline essentially was double its current price. This incredible swing exemplifies how volatile the fossil fuels market can be. Currently, the price paid for a gallon of gas is lower than recent averages, but is still high when compared against historical averages. The reason for the steadily increasing cost in fuel is a lesson in economics. The demand for fuel is continually rising, while the supply of fuel is steadily diminishing. The reason the supply is diminishing: fossil fuels are not a renewable source of energy.

If the sudden spike of fuel taught US drivers anything, it was that efficiency is the key to reducing costs, and ultimately reducing demand. Recently, there has been concern over the American automobile industry’s ability to compete with foreign manufacturers’ higher fuel efficient vehicles. A lot of talk surrounds the CAFÉ Standards. CAFÉ stands for Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency. Simply put the average fuel efficiency an automobile manufacturer is able to achieve with from all product lines. It is no mystery that foreign manufacturers have surpassed the American auto industry with fuel efficiency. Competition over higher fuel efficiency is driving the auto industry, but there is a greater competition in the industry, and that is to manufacture vehicles that do not operate on petroleum based fuels.

When gasoline prices were peaking during the summer, the debate over alternative fuels also peaked. Using an alternative to gasoline was on the mind of every American. Suddenly there was a strong interest in finding another method to power our vehicles. As quickly as the price of fuel has dropped, so has the attention on alternative fuels. The issue is no longer making headlines, and certainly has taken a backseat in the minds of most Americans. President Elect Barack Obama has referred to this phenomenon as “shock and trance.” When the price of fuel spiked, Americans were shocked it could go so high, and stunned by the lack of options. As the price has dropped, we have entered a trance-like state of complacency, forgetting the unbelievable peak.
It is the “shock and trance” that will diminish our enthusiasm for alternative fuels. The time to innovate, and retool has passed. The pursuit of alternative methods to power our automobiles must remain in the forefront of the national debate. Our automobiles are inextricably linked to our economic growth. If the American auto industry is unable to compete with foreign manufacturers developing vehicles powered by alternative fuels, the detrimental effects will be far reaching throughout the American economy. The need for alternative fuel vehicles must be matched with the infrastructure to supply the required fuel to the driver. Neglecting to improve the fuel delivery infrastructure negates all innovations the auto industry produces.

We are years away from seeing a viable alternative omnipresent in our country, both in vehicles and fuel delivery infrastructure. The lack of alternatives is no excuse for maintaining the same driving habits. American drivers must face the fact that a reduction in the consumption of fossil fuels is a necessity to bridge the gap towards alternatives. Fortunately there are many ways to adjust without purchasing a more fuel efficient vehicle; the easiest step to take is to continue to reduce the amount of miles driven. In the past two years Americans have, as a whole, reduced the amount of miles driven. Something that has never occurred in the over one hundred years we have been driving. Many American automobiles are “flex fuel” vehicles. A “flex fuel” vehicle is capable of using ethanol for fuel. The prevalence of ethanol fueling locations is increasing as more and more cars are capable of using the fuel. A low cost method to reducing demand for fuel is to start walking more, or riding a bike. A large percentage of automobile trips are less than 5 miles, these trips can be easily replaced by walking and biking. Lastly, reevaluate commuting options, and begin taking transit, or carpooling to reduce demand for fuel. All of these methods will reduce the demand for fossil fuels, and actually save you money.

The price of gasoline will climb and undoubtedly surpass historic peaks. Eliminating the automobile is not an option, changing its power source is. Change will take time. In the interim, Americans cannot afford to caught in the “shock and trance” cycle and neglect this very important issue.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Portland Installs Colored Bike Boxes



A tool that is useful in keeping cyclists safe on the streets is a “bike box,” a painted area that connects a bike lane to a section in front of the right-hand car lane. This box allows cyclists to move in front of cars so that cars can see riders and not run into them or cut them off when turning right.

Bike boxes have been in existence since the 1980s, but only recently in the U.S. have they been installed and used. NYC and Portland are two cities with a number of bike boxes, and the city of Portland’s Office of Transportation has created green bike lanes and boxes to further highlight the road markings.

These tools are but a few of many that can be implemented for a cost that is relatively low compared to high impact of increased visibility and safety. Especially as more people are becoming aware of the issues of single-occupancy-vehicle dependence and switching to alternative forms of transportation, the need for safe cycling infrastructure is growing. Bike lanes and boxes help make cyclists visible and give them more presence on the road, and the colored versions of these elements further cement the infrastructure, both on the road and in the minds of cyclists and drivers.

For more information, visit this site and watch this video.
(image courtesy of treehugger.com)

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

DVRPC's Connections Hopes to Link Land-Use and Transportation


The Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission is currently working on its long-range plan for the year 2035, entitled Connections. One of the goals of this plan is to show the impact that land-use has on transportation, the environment, and the economic development. DVRPC plans to use Connections to address new regional issues such as climate change and energy needs/usage as well. DVRPC has put a significant amount of effort into making this long-range plan a public process. From January 2008 to April 2008, DVRPC conducted an on-line survey of the public, the results of which have been used as input for the refining of the regional vision.

The next step in engaging the public involves a series of public workshops, to be held in each of the nine counties that represent the DVRPC region. At these workshops, participants are presented with two distinct scenarios for the future of the region: Sprawl and Recentralization. Sprawl involves the movement of population and employment from the urban cores and developed communities to the growing suburbs and rural areas. The Recentralization option locates future population and employment growth in the region’s core cities and other developed communities, which are more pedestrian friendly. DVRPC also developed a Trend scenario, which is based on the planning commission’s actual forecasts for population and employment growth in the region. The Trend option is meant to be used as a baseline for comparison between the other two scenarios. The implications of each scenario on transportation, land-use, energy use, the environment, and economic development are all examined in detail during the public workshops.

After the public workshops are completed, DVRPC plans to develop a transportation financial plan that will outline transportation reinvestment in areas that best support the vision for the DVRPC region. Implementation of the regional plan will involve working with stakeholders throughout the region such as: municipalities, planning commissions, county governments, developers, DOT’s, and citizens’ groups. For more information about DVRPC’s long range plan, Connections, and the locations of public workshops being held in our region, please click here.

Friday, November 14, 2008

ANNUAL TRANSPORTATION CONFERENCE TO FOCUS ON INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING

GVF Transportation, with the support of a number of corporate sponsors, will focus on Infrastructure Funding at their 2008 Transportation Conference, which will be held 8 a.m. Monday, November 17, 2008 at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in King of Prussia.

This year’s guest speakers include representatives from ACT International, Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC), GRI, Montgomery County Planning Commission, PennDOT, SEPTA and Urban Trans. Topics of discussion will include transportation reauthorization, funding and business initiatives, as well as a focus on the impact of climate change.

“As we move forward with a new Presidential Administration and with transportation funding at a critical juncture, we feel this event will give insight into where we are not only as region but nationally as well. Climate change’s impact, transit, and our infrastructure are critical to our success as we compete not only locally but globally,” said Rob Henry, Executive Director of GVF Transportation.

Sponsors of this year’s conference include: Boles Smyth Associates; Gannett Fleming; Gilmore & Associates; Kravco Simon; Lower Providence Township; McMahon; Pennoni Associates Inc.; SEPTA; Traffic Planning and Design, Inc.; Urban Engineers; URS and Verizon.

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Blogger Templates