Wednesday, October 21, 2009

What is a Mega-Region?

As metropolitan regions began to expand throughout the later half of the 20th century, the boundaries between these regions began to blur, creating a new geographic scale known as the "mega-region". Roughly five years ago, the concept of the mega-region surfaced, and was recognized quickly by urban planners and regionalists as a new way to look at the United States when it came to advocating for infrastructure funding. The mega-region concept is being pushed most prominently by America 2050, a national initiative to meet the infrastructure, economic development, and environmental challenges of the nation as we prepare to add about 130 million additional Americans by the year 2050. Since mega-regions are where most of the population growth by mid-century will take place, America 2050 has made this concept a major focus. Mega-regions comprise multiple adjacent metropolitan areas connected by overlapping commuting patterns, business travel, linked economies, environmental landscapes and watersheds, and social networks.

The rise of the mega-region concept has as much to do with development patterns and local economies as anything else. In the past, states have been the primary advocate for infrastructure funding. However, as the diversity between urban regions within states continues to grow, and as the development patterns around cities continues to expand in a sprawling manner, it has become clear that states may not necessarily be the best adovcating force for funding infrastructure improvements. For example although New York City and Buffalo are both in the state of New York, they have very different economies and face different challenges with economic development, infrastructure, and the environment. New York City identifies more economically with Philadelphia, Baltimore, Boston, and Washington D.C. Meanwhile, the issues Buffalo faces are more similar to those faced by Cleveland, Detroit, Pittsburgh, and Chicago.

At least ten mega-regions have been identified in the U.S. In Pennsylvania, Philadelphia and the eastern part of the Commonwealth are covered by the Northeast Mega-Region, while the western part of the Commonwealth is covered by the Great Lakes Mega-Region.

Mega-regions very well may shape the future of transportation in the U.S. In the second half of the 20th century, the Interstate Highway System enabled the growth of metropolitan regions throughout the country. Now, emerging mega-regions need a transportation network that will work for places 200-500 miles across. The Obama administration's desired nationwide high-speed rail system may very well be that transportation alternative. Mega-regions also will need new intermodal freight systems that link rail, truck, seaports, and airports. Improvements to the freight system will need to create new capacity, to make the nation's goods movement system more efficient and reliable as it becomes increasingly integrated into global markets.

The goal of the mega-region concept is to focus economic development and job creation into areas with the infrastructure in place to support all this population increase. It will strengthen already economically viable areas, and fight against the sprawling development pattern that has in many ways symbolized the later half of the 20th century. By negating sprawl and encouraging the vitality of these mega-regions, it will be easier for the U.S. to focus finite amounts of transportation and infrastructure funding.

For more information about Mega-Regions and America 2050, please click here

Wednesday, October 7, 2009

Which Project Should be Built

Which project gets funding, and ultimately gets built? This is a classic problem transportation planners have faced, and are facing more frequently as a result of the fiscal constraints placed on project funding. Deciding which project to fund is not an easy decision to make, and the results can have long lasting impacts on a region. In the US 422 Corridor the list of “wants” far surpasses the available funds; even more difficult is that the list of “needs”, projects that are of highest priority, also exceed the available funds.

Industry-wide innovative financing models are being implemented to fill the funding gap for large expensive infrastructure projects. Methods, which primarily center privatization of an asset and assessing user fees to raise revenue, are being used throughout the nation, and world. This concept, known as a Public Private Partnership, or P3, has been met with varying degrees of success and carries its own set of advantages and disadvantages. In most cases however, one of the leading factors into the success of a P3 is placing high value, and thus a high priority on the improvements provided by the P3 and followed closely by a willingness to pay for the improvements.

What does this mean for the US 422 Corridor? It has been no secret that user fees are being explored as a method for raising revenue to make the necessary improvements on US 422. Collecting a nominal fee from the tens of thousands of daily trips on US 422 may provide the funds to complete such improvements as new and more efficient bridges, access ramps, and additional capacity on the highway mainline. This is not a new model for highway funding; anyone who has traveled on the PA Turnpike has experienced the benefits first hand.

If improvements are to be made on the US 422 Corridor, it is important that residents and business owners understand the current situation in funding infrastructure at both the state and federal level. The recent budget crisis in Harrisburg underscores the need to begin rethinking how projects are built. Funding from the Federal Highway Administration is not any brighter. For the second year the highway trust fund has required an emergency infusion of cash from Congress to keep it from going bankrupt. That situation is leaving major improvement projects like US 422 with little hope for a large influx of funds. Without question, it is time we begin to think differently about paying for our roads.

Without question improvements must be made to US 422. The highway is under capacity for the daily demand placed on it, the bridges need to be replaced, and the access ramps are not consistent with modern design standards. Improvements to US 422 will improve the quality of life for corridor residents, attract new businesses to the region, and create jobs and opportunities. The future economic competiveness for the US 422 Corridor should be top priority for all residents and businesses. Changing how we think about infrastructure funding is one mechanism to ensure success for the future. As always, to stay connected with this issue and the progress of the proposal visit www.422corridor.com.

Monday, October 5, 2009

DEP Announces Funding is Available for Alternative Fuel Transportation Projects in Pennsylvania

Department of Environmental Protection Secretary John Hanger announced today the opening of reimbursement grant funding for clean, alternative fuel transportation projects in Pennsylvania. A total of $7 million is available for innovative, advanced fuel and vehicle technology projects resulting in cleaner, advanced transportation within the state.

Eligible projects would focus on the use of alternative fuels and the use of fuel saving vehicles, fleets and technologies.

The application package (including guidance and application forms) can be found at www.depweb.state.pa.us, keyword: "Alternative Fuels" or by contacting the Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Energy and Technology Deployment, 15th Floor, Rachel Carson State Office Building, 400 Market Street, P.O. Box 8772, Harrisburg, PA 15105-8772, 717-783-8411.



Click Here to read full article on the AFIG Grant Program
A link to the specifics of the AFIG Grant program can be found Here

Thursday, October 1, 2009

Pennsylvania Seeks Funding for High-Speed Rail


Pennsylvania recently requested $28.2 million from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act for high speed rail upgrades to the Amtrak Keystone Corridor between Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. For the Keystone East Corridor, between Philadelphia and Harrisburg, the state is asking the federal government for $27.45 million in recovery funds. The money would be used for various track replacements/rehabilitations, and signal system upgrades. There would also be an addition of a third rail between Atglen and Paoli.

The state is also seeking $750,000 for a feasibility study for high-speed service in the Keystone Corridor West, from Harrisburg to Pittsburgh. Only a single train a day serves this corridor, which is actually owned by Norfolk Southern. The mountainous topography and increasing freight traffic have caused many experts to question the feasibility of creating high-speed rail lines to Western Pennsylvania. PennDOT views the Keystone West planning as part of a larger plan to link intercity rail service throughout various parts of the United States.

Track enhancements to the Keystone East Corridor should improve rail service by increasing the top operating speed from 110 MPH to 125 MPH, with the goal of reducing travel time between Harrisburg and Philadelphia to approximately 75 minutes. These improvements will ensure that that Amtrak Keystone East High Speed service remains a competitive transportation alternative and supports the line's increasing ridership. In the two years since the state initially upgraded and electrified the track between Harrisburg and Philadelphia, PennDOT cites a ridership increase of 26%.

PennDOT has made the improvements to the Amtrak Keystone East Corridor a part of an overall effort to improve the rail service and stations, known as Plan the Keystone. For more information on Plan the Keystone, please click on the hyperlink to their website below.

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Blogger Templates